Writing task 1: Internet users as percentage of population.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of people using the Internet in three countries, namely the USA, Canada and Mexico between 1999 and 2009.
It is clear that the rates of people who had access to the Internet in Canada and Mexico sharply increased during the period shown. By contrast, American users dropped slightly before rising in the next period from 2005 to 2009.
In 1999, 20% of internet usage in the United State compared to some minority Internet users in Canada and Mexico. But in the next three years from 2001 to 2003, there was seen the number of people who used the Internet in the USA felt slightly to by 5%.
While there were almost 100% Canada users who accessed the networking in 2009 compared to just 40% in Mexico. However, the rates of internet users in America and Mexico showed a similar trend register nearly 80% and just under 40% respectively.
- The charts below give information about the people use the public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000. 73
- percentage of Uk people using internet 67
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The charts below give information about the people use the public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rnet in the USA felt slightly to by 5%. While there were almost 100% Canada users who...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74025974026 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24915418596 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.0413662382 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162625833603 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855611392142 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478685216361 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105140575886 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403657968061 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.