The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrate the number of marriages and divorces in a 30-year period and the percentage of marital statuses of adults in two specific years, 1970 and 2000. These figures were recorded in the USA.
It is clear that the number of marriages was much higher than that of divorces in the period. Meanwhile, married adults occupied the largest percentage in both years.
There were 2.5 million marriages in 1970 and this figure remained stable in the next 10 years followed by a gradual decrease in the last two decades to 2 million in 2000. The number of divorces hit a peak at nearly 1.5 million in 1980 and fluctuated around 1 million in other years.
After 30 years, the percentage of married adults experienced a slight drop, decreasing from 70% in 1970 to under 60% in 2000. That of the adults who never get married rose over the period, with an increase of only 5%. The widowed and the divorced saw an opposite trend with the percentage was under 10% in two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Nisha_k | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | abelin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Ali Rizwan | 67 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where 73
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 84
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 75
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...These figures were recorded in the USA. It is clear that the number of marriages...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66285714286 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41725768049 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.183222345 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222518300291 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944678709353 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787532793886 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150235189203 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834531131003 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.