The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.summaris the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
summaris the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates, the information regarding the both genders who are entering to the married life in different age during the year of 1996 and 2008. Units are measured in percentage.

Overall, in the age of 25-29 most of the females( near to 12% ) are getting married in both years, as compared to males, they are about to 10% in 1996 and which flawed in to 8% in 2008. Likewise, mere 1% peoples are involved in marriage during the age of 16-19 in given period.

With regards to the females, in 1996, around 6% of women who is changing their status from single in the time of 20-34 years period, which is gradually declined to 4% in years 35-44. While, males are remained constant in the age of 25-34 approximately 10% 1996 and that considerably below the following age about 7% or less. Moreover nearly 3% of males are married in 20-24 age as compare to females, whereas, females are at the bottom line(mere 2%) in the age of 40-44 which is only 2% in contrast to males.

In terms of married people in 2008, comparatively different than 1996 in both sex, while, females are choose to get married age is 25-29 around 12% and it is consciously decreased to the following years,and which is downed to near 3% in the year of 40-44. similarly, males are prone to get joined in the age of 30-34 which is above 10% and it is changing dramatically to just over 6% .

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-06-16 eyraen 67 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of 25-29 most of the females near to 12% are getting married in both years, as co...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...low the following age about 7% or less. Moreover nearly 3% of males are married in 20-24...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...people in 2008, comparatively different than 1996 in both sex, while, females are ch...
^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...an 1996 in both sex, while, females are choose to get married age is 25-29 around 12% ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ciously decreased to the following years,and which is downed to near 3% in the year ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...downed to near 3% in the year of 40-44. similarly, males are prone to get joined in the a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is changing dramatically to just over 6% .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, regarding, similarly, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.484 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51138895651 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.478806268 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175796656925 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787955180495 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585231099356 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127140467147 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343915251327 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.