The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram illustrates the vast changes of Lynnfield town from the years 1963 and 2007. Overall, the city shows commercial, residential and easily accessible development over the given period.
In 1963, only the southeast corner shows some development when compared to three other sides with one government office. Whereas, years after the office changed as a museum and the remaining farmland was replaced with golf land in 2007. Likewise, the northeast area also shows dramatic changes with large residential buildings near the river.
Nevertheless, there are minimal differences on the other side of the map such as they renovate the cycle path to the road and cutting down two more trees on the upper side of the map only.
While, in the city centre a big shopping mall was built but either side the post office, bank and library kept the same. Along with that, sweet shop, butchers was removed by supermarket and flower shop moved by a travel agent.
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.? 11
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer Some think this cannot be avoided To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06875 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47574957084 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1755101995 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855396954491 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038107165806 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363799209951 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529763279134 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399181802496 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.