The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

The pie chart illustrates the following information pertaining to the three age groups in Yemen and Italy and the projections for 2050.
Its quite lucid that, in Yemen, youth comprised almost half of the population stated at 50.1%, whereas the figures for the young adults stood at 46.3% in the population. The young adults had the lions share in terms of population in Italy, however the old aged secured the second spot in population ranking.
Moving to the details, the young with highest population in Yemen for 2000 which was at exact 50.1 % almost half of the population. Moreover, the young adults, who had second(hyphen) biggest numbers in population count were placed second according to the figures at 46.3% few percent lower than the youngs. However, the old people in age bracket (60+) years hardly had a popualtion count with figures at 3.6% .
Elaborating further, the young adults with 61.6% had the majority in Italy’s population whereas the older class in age group(60) were nearly less than the quarter of population.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-23 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-07-23 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-07-23 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-07-21 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-07-21 Ahmad_off 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart illustrates the following info...
^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... half of the population stated at 50.1%, whereas the figures for the young adults...
^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in terms of population in Italy, however the old aged secured the second spot in ...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ing. Moving to the details, the young with highest population in Yemen for 2000 which was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Moving to the details, the young with highest population in Yemen for 2000 whi...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'secondhyphen the biggest'.
Suggestion: secondhyphen the biggest
...on. Moreover, the young adults, who had secondhyphen biggest numbers in population count were placed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...second according to the figures at 46.3% few percent lower than the youngs. Howev...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the old people in age bracket 60+ years hardly had a popualtion count with figur...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a popualtion count with figures at 3.6% . Elaborating further, the young adults...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...a popualtion count with figures at 3.6% . Elaborating further, the young adults ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05263157895 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5766086416 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.264317016 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283411509938 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144121984419 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131859886464 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205229009622 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142142269902 0.0819641961636 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.