The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The four pie charts show that different ages and the prediction in the two countries between 2000 to 2050.

It is noticeable that the youngest age is the largest proportion in Yemen in 2000 and the age from 15 to 59 is the biggest proportion in Italy. However, in 2050, the population of 15 to 59 years is the biggest part in Yemen and Italy.

In 2000, there are 50.1% of the age from 0 to 14 is the biggest part in the population in Italy while the age on 15 to 59 become the first main population in 2050 which the percentage increase from 46.3 to 57.3. By contract, in Italy, the main part of population is always on the age of 15 to 59 which decrease from 2000 to 2050 that the percentage change from 61.6 to 46.2.

In addition, the elderly who age over 60 is the smallest part in Italy from 2000 to 2050 which the percentage are 3.6 and 5.7 that shows in slowly increased. While the percentage of the over 60 pears person in Italy from 24.1 to 42.3. And the change of age of 0 to 14 is not big that decrease from 14.3% to 11.5%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-25 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-09-22 nijam 67 view
2023-08-09 ycgtang 67 view
2023-01-04 nle2006 73 view
2022-08-05 lucluc 78 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and 5.7 that shows in slowly increased. While the percentage of the over 60 pears per...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.13793103448 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3094781321 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399014778325 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 166.292994441 43.030603864 386% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.0 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194875630563 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115733838894 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425659064002 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133832218673 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277998735046 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.72 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.62 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.