The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of the location of dance classes in four distinct area, while the bar chart gives some data about the number of types of dance classes in three groups by age group in a town in Australia.
It is obvious that the majority of students have tendency to enroll in private studios and college-based studios has lowest percentage. Young people whom are between 11 and 16 years of age like modern dance classes and under 11 like attend in the ballet classes.
As can be seen, children who want to sign in dance classes are near a half percent in private studios, and school halls by almost a quarter percent located in second place where student can go there after their schools. The to other remains groups are community halls and other, and college-based studios which order by 18 and 10 percent. Thus, the private studios in more popular among pupils. The number of children in ballet class have reached to 600 who are under 11 and 11-16 are less than 300. Although the number of under 11 children is highest in ballet in modern dance classes in lowest that others. The trend of under 11 completely is likes 11-16 by in reverse type. The number of students in each three classes in under 11 is order 600, by about 450, and 300 and in 11-16 age group is 300, 400, and more than 500.
In conclusion, the density of privet studios in more than other location, ballet and modern types of dance classes are more liked by student in different age group, while tap located in middle.
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5641025641 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26610589965 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479853479853 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1685462696 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145621183487 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586455133332 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657667070216 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117045049331 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659063648364 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.