The charts below gives information on the age group of population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projected for 2050.
The all charts depict, the population of Yemen and Italy of three different age groups in 2000 and projected the same age groups population in 2050.
Overall, each slice of pie chart shows the population of 0-14 , 15-59 and over 60 years age groups. In 2000, Yemen and Italy highest percentage age group was 0-14 and 15-59 respectively, whereas, in 2050, 15-59 age group was highest in both country.
As per the Yemen pie chart, in 2000 age group of 0-14 was highest with over 50%, but in 2050, it was predicted exact 37%. Similarly, 15-59 age group population will increase by 11% in 2050 and over 60 year’s population slightly soar from 3.6% to 5.7% in 2050. It indicates that, in Yemen, it was predicted that working manpower (15-59) will increase, which will be beneficial for country.
According to Italy pie chart, the portion of old age (over 60 years), will upsurge from 24.1% to 42.3% in 2050, however, the teenager's percentage will decline slightly. Moreover, the productive age group (15-59), will also decrease in 2050 than in 2000 (from 61.6% to 46.2%), hence still remain the highest proportion in 2050. The pie chart shows that, the retire group percentage will increase in Italy in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Nikhil Dutt Sharma | 67 | view |
- the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time summarize the information by selecting and r 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer a 78
- energy consumption in 2007 in US 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f pie chart shows the population of 0-14 , 15-59 and over 60 years age groups. In ...
^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...om 24.1% to 42.3% in 2050, however, the teenagers percentage will decline slightly. Moreo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'remain the highest'.
Suggestion: remain the highest
...n 2000 from 61.6% to 46.2%, hence still remain highest proportion in 2050. The pie chart shows...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tion in 2050. The pie chart shows that, the retire group percentage will increase in Italy...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage will increase in Italy in 2050.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81553398058 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39406954747 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480582524272 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6981780705 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411179337225 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215973803222 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130985854385 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329947775648 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129350922 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.