the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients , all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much
The charts given illustrate the ratio of sodium saturated fat and added sugar consumed in Americans' breakfasts, lunches, dinners, snacks and it can be harmful if eaten plenty in quantity.
Overall, dinners and lunches that the USA residents consume are sodium and saturated fat rich. On the other hand, their snacks have a high portion of added sugar.
The first chart illustrates the intake of sodium by Americans. Their dinners have a massive 43% of sodium, higher than lunches with 29%, breakfasts and snacks with 14% each. The second chart outlines the amount of saturated fat that the citizens consume. The dinners once again have a high proportion of fat, followed by lunches with 26⁰%, snacks with 21% and breakfasts with 16%. The final chart shows the ratio of added sugar in these 4 typical meals. Unlike the two above, their snacks account for a hefty 42% of sugar, followed by 23%, 19%, 16% in dinners, lunches, breakfasts respectively. It is worth noting that these all 3 nutrients are much less consumed in breakfasts by Americans.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others said that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England ans Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- the diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nacks with 21% and breakfasts with 16%. The final chart shows the ratio of added su...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98295454545 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49124888815 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9384623394 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899740912924 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444609335101 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519205793107 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572964758256 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405300500046 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.