The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line charts illustrate what percentage of households in one country owned washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners and how much time per week a household there spent doing housework from 1920 to 2019.
In general, the most striking feature is that these three types of electrical appliances witnessed an increase in their popularity while the number of hours per week residents spent on household chores significantly went down over 99 years.
In terms of the ownership of electric devices, although no one obtained a refrigerator in their house in 1920, after 60 years, all households had their own refrigerators and this percentage remained steadily until 2019. As a result, refrigerators were the most popular electric appliances. Whereas there were also more people owning washing machines, but this proportion did not go up as dramatically as that of refrigerators. Therefore, at the beginning of this period, the percentage of households with washing machines was the highest, at 40 percent while in 2019, this percentage was the lowest, at approximately 75 percent. In addition, there was a significant increase in the proportion of families with vacuum cleaners from a third in 1920 to their peak of 100 percent in 2000, and then stayed stable until 2019.
Due to the development of electrical appliances, it took people less time to do their housework. The number of hours of housework per week showed a downward trend and hit a trough of roughly 10 percent in 2019, which was only one-fifth of that figure in 1920.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 92
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
- In some country more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
The two line charts manifest…
The two line charts manifest the alteration in the right of possession of electrical apparatuses and number of time taken to do household chores in one nation over a period of 99 years.
In 1920, the percentage utilization of refrigerator was 0%, which surged to over 50% and 90% in 1940 and 1960 respectively. In the year of 1980, it had a steady increase by 10% and leveled off 100% throughout the next years. The percentage using vacuum cleaner and washing mechine had a minuscule difference ( 30% and 40% for each), which augmented by 10% in 1940 and rose to the similar level (at 70%) after 20 years. Following that years, they had contrasting trends. The utilization of vacuum cleaner grew to 90% and 100% in 1980 and 2000 respestively and unchanging in next years, while the using of washing mechanic slightly fell in1980 ( under 70%) and increased again in following years ( roughly 70% between 2000 and 2019).
In 1920, it was a half, which decreased gradually in 1940 and 1960 (over 30% amd 20% respectively). It flattened out over 10% from 1980 to 2000 and had a slight decline to one in ten in 2019.
Overall, the percentage of electrical gadgets in households were increasing whereas amout of time weeky to do housework was falling.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, third, whereas, while, in addition, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15019762846 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97109132293 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0359232221 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.777777778 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226000431236 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945774143797 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072587658624 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157720021687 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661583485691 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.