The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs elucidate the change in the proportion of household appliances ownership and the number of housework hours per week in approximately 100 years (1920-2019)
Overall, all household gadgets witnessed an upward trend, except for the washing machine. It is also noticeable that the number of weekly housework declined by year.
Regarding electrical equipment, the number of refrigerators registered at the lowest point in 1920, roughly 0% before becoming the most favourite item in every family, proliferating to 100% after 60 years in 1980. A similar pattern was recorded in vacuum cleaners with 30% of households in 1920, then escalating sharply to 100% and merged with the refrigerators line from 2000. Meanwhile, starting at the highest percentage, the washing machine climbed to 70% in 1960 but dropped slightly by 5% in 1980, and bounced back to 72% in 2019.
In terms of house chores hours per week, the number fell drastically by more than half from 50 hours to only 20 hours in 1960. From the 60s, the speed decelerated and reached 10 hours at the end of the period. The average number throughout the timelines was calculated around 24 hours per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- In some countries come criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business while others think that it provides more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...e change in the proportion of household appliances ownership and the number of housework h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0621761658 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79703497568 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647668393782 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1819775342 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969858501967 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396773307314 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514861821713 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781075341416 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755586232427 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.