The charts below show the destination of secondary school leavers for
young Australians in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Three pie charts indicate the information about options of students in Australia after graduating from secondary school in three different years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of people who are employed while fewer students decide to continue further education.
In 1980, a half of students in Australia who leaving secondary school pursued higher levels of education to broad the knowledge. After a-10-year period, this figure decreased slightly to 38% and then remained nearly unchanged in 2000. The percentage of students who were jobless was the smallest with only 10%, 12% and 8% in 1980, 1990 and 2000 respectively.
Meanwhile, there was a possitive development in the total of secondary school leavers who have a job. The proportion of people who were in employment raised from 40% in 1980 to 55% in 2000- which was the most popular options of students in 1990 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | anna103 | view | |
| 2017-02-24 | mr.cuong95 | 72 | view |
| 2017-02-24 | mr.cuong95 | 47 | view |
- The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 198o and 2002 Summarise information and make comparison which relevant 67
- Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing education achievement Discuss this view and give your own opinion 91
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11258278146 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.655538305 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4571238349 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247778252405 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118668217223 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707960505534 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151959800762 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908147607803 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.