The charts below show how selected age groups bought concert, cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2013 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed.
The first chart indicates the percentage of two different demographics bought ticket to concert, cinema and theater online. Meanwhile, the second chart illustrates what devices did they use to bought ticket online in three nation over the the spring season of the year 2013.
Overall, Malaysian did not have the same pattern and bought as much ticket as the two others nation. It is seemed that most people from the three countries chose desktop computer to purchase while mobile phone was the least favored.
Regarding the two demographics, Australia and UK had the same pattern while Malaysia was reversed. Around 54% of the buyer from 25-44 years old bought ticket online in Australia and UK. In the second group who above 65 years old, approximately 44% bought an online ticket in Australia and 40% in UK, equally to the Malaysian. The pattern was reversed in Malaysia because there was a slight 5% lower percentage in the 25-44 group which is around 38%.
Most ticket were bought from desktop computer with the proportion above 60% in all three countries. By contrast, there was under a quarter of audience used mobile phone to place a seat at theater alike places. It was noticeable that only 30% of the tickets were bought from laptop in the UK which is quite lower than in Australia and Malaysia where are around 45%.
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 78
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 65
- Some countries import a large amount of food from others To what extent is this a positive or negative 84
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...ey use to bought ticket online in three nation over the the spring season of the year ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ught ticket online in three nation over the the spring season of the year 2013. Over...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ught ticket online in three nation over the the spring season of the year 2013. Over...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: THE_FALL_SEASON[1]
Message: Use simply 'spring'.
Suggestion: spring
... ticket online in three nation over the the spring season of the year 2013. Overall, Malaysian...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88986784141 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42263514689 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546255506608 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6420924425 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.909090909 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244265098697 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975174993799 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567238776975 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159775212489 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724618554425 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.