The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990.
The given bar charts compares the educational involvement of students total years of schooling and also they participated in science and technical subjects and study in industrialized and developing countries year between 1980 to 1990.
As observed from first graph, the average years of schooling in developing countries was only above 2 years while it was above 8 years in industrialized countries in 1980. After 10 years, the number of the year in average schooling increased in both developing and industrialized countries and reached almost above 3 years in developing countries and above 10 years in industrialized countries.
According to second bar graph, the number of scientists and technician were much higher in industrialized countries compare with developing countries. The scientist and technician were less than 20 per 100 people in developing countries in both year 1980 and 1990.
Finally in third graph, it can be seen clearly that spending on research and development was much better in industrialized countries. In 1980, they spending 50 US billion $ in developing countries but it decreased drastically half 25 US billion $ in 1990. While in industrialized countries climbed higher and reached above 300 US billion $ in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-30 | Harrykaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 67 | view |
| 2018-05-09 | Ukhoching Chak Daniel | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-03 | sanih98 | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-29 | Meetgandhi | 78 | view |
- Some movies are serious designed to make the audience think other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain which type of movie do you prefer 61
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate what problems does it cause how can we save these problems 69
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- IELTS Plus 3 - Writing Practice Test 1the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000,2005 and 2010 about the university. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st above 3 years in developing countries and above 10 years in industrialized cou...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ountries in both year 1980 and 1990. Finally in third graph, it can be seen clearly ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earch and development was much better in industrialized countries. In 1980, they ...
^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...countries. In 1980, they spending 50 US billion $ in developing countries but it decrea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...but it decreased drastically half 25 US billion $ in 1990. While in industrialized coun...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies climbed higher and reached above 300 US billion $ in 1990.
^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...limbed higher and reached above 300 US billion $ in 1990.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46391752577 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2328051906 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479381443299 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1014552794 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341262870106 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169733812707 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759047849214 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231325121184 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730580134654 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.