The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The bar charts describe the main reasons for study among the students at different ages and how much they could gain from their employers. Overall, it is clear that when people grew older, they were more willing to study for interest rather than for career. Besides, the age group under 26 could get the most support from companies, while that of 30 to 39 the least support.
Starting with the first chart, at under 26, people studying for career were far more than those studying for interest, 80% and 10% respectively. When people became older, this difference narrowed, and when they were in their forties, the number for career was equal to that for interest, at 40% each. At over 49, there was an opposite gap, because there more people for interest(70%) than people for career(20%).
Turning now to the second chart, the amount of support that people under 26 could gain was the largest, at 62%. When people were older, it declined, and when they were in their thirties, it was the smallest, at 30%. Afterwards, however, it reflected a slight increase with age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2774404148 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297393404696 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136569903443 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12368662583 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225469404603 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152434777374 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.