International sporting events make an important contribution to internal peace. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, many hold the view that global sporting competitions are beneficial to world peace. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that it may be useless and even detrimental to international peace. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that worldwide sporting events can cultivate a good relationship between different nations. This is because these activities can provide national delegations from all over the world with a golden opportunity to communicate with each other, thus promoting the understanding of each other. In addition, international sports games can help win respect from other countries, since the games also offer players from various countries a platform to show their talents in some kind of sports. For examples, runners from Jamaica can surprise other participants through their fast speed in the 100 meters race and receive numerous praise from them, which will definitely benefit the future relationship between each other.
On the other hand, nevertheless, the international sports may harm the world peace. This is because some games will be competitive and in order to win the first prize players who represent their own country may exert violent behavior on others, which may lead to conflicts between nations and affect negatively their future harmony. For examples, it is not uncommon to see that football fans with two distinct nationalities fight against each other after one team beats the other in the World Cup.
To summarise, there is no doubt that international sporting events lead to better understanding between countries and help win respect. At the same time, nonetheless, violent conflicts brought by them are not to be neglected. In the final analysis, one can only conclude that gathering nations to play sports can indeed contribute to world peace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study. 81
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical health services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 61
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that global sporting competiti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...des of the debate and give my opinion. To begin with, it is undeniable that wor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, kind of, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28903654485 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8123939086 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1231005389 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176775697238 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764583211633 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546383193672 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125027924786 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399653413755 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.