The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The bar graph illustrates how many percentage of the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Overall, the young person tent to choose career for their reasons of study, while elderly study for interest. Besides, employers show their interest on younger one, so they support them more than older one.
A glance at the chart provided reveals people who is under 26 age pay much attention to career in their study, making them to become the highest percentage in reasons for study. It was 70% higher than that of people who is studying for their interest. This trend continues in other age groups such as people who is from 26 to 39 age although the rate of people who study for interest increase slightly. However, when people get older, they change their mind which the rate of people study for interest account for 70% in the age group “over 49” in spite of same percentage in the group which people is from 40 to 49 age, with over 40%.
On the other hand, while employers do not support too much for people who has age from 30 to 39, with only 30%, the figure for people in the age group “under 26” rise to 60%, making this group continue the highest percentage in the bar chart about employers support. Moreover, in the elderly people, they has an upward trend in the amount of support they received from employers, when they is older than before.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
2019-10-07 | lordwind | 73 | view |
2019-10-07 | lordwind | 67 | view |
2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should spen 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The bar graph illustrates how many percentage of the main reasons for study among stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 316, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
.... Moreover, in the elderly people, they has an upward trend in the amount of suppor...
^^^
Line 13, column 401, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...they received from employers, when they is older than before.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so, while, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7421875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25204713729 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49609375 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5299928035 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.888888889 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427330299896 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201383516843 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160550713107 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325417722493 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185565860355 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.