The vertical bar graph and line graph illustrates the information in terms of millions and percentage about the numbers of Japanese tourists commuting for abroad and also show the Australian share of Japanese visitors market in the year from 1985 to 1995.
It is evident that in 1985, there was 5 millions Japanese tourists travelled to abroad and after that, the numbers of travelling visitors were gradually increased from 1986 to 1990 and they till at 11 millions. Moreover, in 1991, there were 1 millions decreased and then, in following the number visitors were steadily rising and in 1995, they were searched reached to 15 million.
Further, the line graph demonstrate that in 1985, the Australia's share of Japan's tourist market were stood on 2 percent after that, the percentage of share was gradually increased for next three years, still at 4.8% but, in 1989, the percentage of share were decreased to 4.1%. After that, in 1990 to 1993, the Australia's share percentage were steadily rising and reached to the peak. There was a small decrease in percentage and they still on 6% in 1994.
Hence, it is apperant that there was maximum increase in Japanese visitors travelling but, in the second last year the Australia's share was reached on the top throughout the given period.
- The major cities in the world are growing fast, as well as their problems. What are the problems that young people living in cities are facing with? Give solutions to these problems. 61
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 79
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 71
- Parents of obese children should be punished for making their children fat?Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, moreover, second, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98611111111 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56215181314 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467592592593 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3356226728 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.857142857 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244912916381 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12100773565 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991055238691 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168713096531 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836061439585 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.