The charts below show the number of working hours per week, in the industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The four bar diagrams illustrate and compare the data on the percentage of workers spending hours at the workplace per week in France, Denmark, Sweden, and the UK in 2002. Overall, it can be observed that the maximum staff in Denmark, Sweden, and the UK worked 36-40 hours in a week whereas it is 31-35 hours in France.
Examining the dataset of four countries in more detail, it is clear that in France, half of the workers worked 31-35 hours per week. The percentages of those who worked 36-40 and 46-50 hours is 36% and 20% respectively the rest of the working hours accounted for around 10% of staff.
In Denmark, the percentage of workers worked for 36-40 hours is 70%. The rest of the working hours other than 35-40 are worked by 10% of employees.
In Sweden, 80% of total workers spent 36-40 hours which is the highest among all countries in 2002. Approximately 38% and 35% of staff worked for 31-35 and 41-45 hours respectively. For the UK, half of the total industrial employees worked for 36-40 hours while the 20% or less the worker spent the rest of the times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-12 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | dich duong thien ti | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Efuli | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | sp | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that studying literature is important for individual character building while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both point of view and provide your own opinion 84
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 75
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 75
- The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57512953368 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40236891688 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455958549223 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9426337634 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1111111111 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181251093031 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100932206948 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354990612409 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136329287771 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274651511887 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.