The charts below show the numbers of men and women attending four evening classes in a secondary school in Britain and the percentage of these in 5 different age groups.
The bar graph compares the numbers of males and females who are taking evening courses at a particular British secondary school and the pie chart illustrates the age profile of these students.
Overall, there are more women than men attending evening classes in one of Britain's secondary schools. It is also noticeable that evening courses are more popular among older adults.
According to the bar graph, drama, painting and language courses all attracted more females than men, while sculpture is the only class with a higher number of males, and is only taken by a small minority with 15 people in total. Language class has the most students overall, with 40 women and 20 men whereas painting is a popular choice among both genders attracting 30 females and around 25 males. There are 20 women in drama class which is 2 times higher than male participants.
People who are attending the evening lessons are mostly 50 and above at 42%, followed by the age group of 40-49 with 26%. The middle age group represents 16 % of the total attendees, while younger adults are in minority, with only 11% of students aged 20-29 and a mere 5% of under 20.
- The bar graph below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 70
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol 78
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2019 and future projections for 2025. 56
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80904522613 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40702617352 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1479166242 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252732885054 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118667858827 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907174721682 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163334919569 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637421363826 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.