The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts supply data concerning water usage for three different purposes in six regions in the world.
It is manifest that South American, Africa, Central Asia and South Asia consume most of their water for agriculture, while North American and Europe allocate the biggest proportion of their water usage to industrial use.
To begin with, the percentage of water usage for agriculture is the highest in Central Asia with 88%, followed by Africa, Southeast Asia and South American with 84, 81 and 71% respectively. By contrast, the water usage for this sector just accounts for about one third of the total water consumption in North America and Europe.
However, approximately a half of the total water usage in two aforementioned areas is for their industries, whereas the figures for others is only around 12%. Also, the percentage of water consumed for Domestic use in South American is the largest with 19%, followed in turn by Europe (15%) and North American (13%), while others' figures for this sector are negligible.
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is to a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give your opinion 56
- the charts show the percentage of enrolments on six courses at a local education college in the UK in 2010 and 2012 92
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63003677267 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3559257151 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194484137786 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118657530136 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626530086819 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144701414493 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666161332333 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.