The chart illustrates the proportion of the government expenditure on infrastructure (roads and transport) in 4 different nations through the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
What stands out from the chart is that governments in Italy and Portugal spent more money on roads and traffic than UK and US countries. As you can see, the UK was the country expending the least money on two types of infrastructure.
In 1990, Portugal was considered the biggest spender on roads and traffic, about 27%. While the percentage of Italy’s expenditure ranked second at approximately 23%, that of the USA and UK ranked third and fourth respectively, at 12% and 11%. However, in 1995, the proportion of government spending on roads and transport reduced slightly (from 1 to 3%) in all 4 countries.
By 2000, while the percentage of Portugal’s expenditure on road and transport continued to reduce at around 22%, Italy was the leading spender on infrastructure. At the same time, Great Britain and the USA had also increased their transport budget rapidly to 12 and 13%. In 2005, all countries except the USA fell, including Italy at 19%, Portugal at 20%, and the UK at 7%.
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 65
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution However others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93367346939 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99587996277 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9485154932 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289323604513 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127448509458 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117813729187 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205216304937 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123744359112 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.