The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts provide information about the tendency of using water in six areas of the world, which conclude North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and East Asia.
It is obvious that these areas show various levels of water use for three purposes: Industrial use, Agricultural use, domestic use. However, North America and Europe indicate the clear differences with the rest.
To be specific, North America and Europe had impressive numbers of water use for industry, which were 48% and 53% respectively while other areas had modest figures in this field, about under 12%. Especially, these numbers reached to the bottom in Central Asia and South Asia with 7%.
In contrast, the main purpose of using water in other areas was Agricultural use. The consumption in this field peaked at 88% in Central Asia, followed by Africa, which just less by 4%. In Europe and North America, the rates for Agricultural usage were not a half, which were 32% and 39% respectively.
The only same thing between six areas is that the proportions for domestic use were low (under 20%). The area that had a large number of this field was South America, with 19%; and in Central Asia, it just took 5% of the total.
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Imprionment 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve our environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e were low under 20%. The area that had a large number of this field was South America, with 19%;...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42210679387 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531400966184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0374815149 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198507184673 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892792806004 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841634930798 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128157582926 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474611667166 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.