The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following pie charts illustrate what percentage British students of a specific university in UK could speak other languages alongside English in two different years of 2000 and 2010.
As can be clearly observed from the graphs, the change of percentage during 200 to 2010 can be divided in two distinctive groups. The first group consists of students who could not speak any other languages than English and those students were able to speak only French or only German beside English. While the share of students with ability to speak only German remained fixed about 10% during 2000 to 2010, there was a significant fall in No other language section and French only part, from 20% to 10% and from 15% to 10% respectively, at the same course.
However, the proportion of students who could speak one or two other languages and Spanish in addition to English, which are placed in the second group, witnessed a considerable climb within 2000 to 2010. Despite the fact that the largest proportion of students could speak Spanish with English, as their mother tongue, in both 2000 by 30% and 2010 by 35%, the same percentage of increase was observable in either Another language section which went up from 15% to 20% within 2000 to 2010, Tow other languages from 10% to 15% at the same period.
It is clear from the graphs that unlike French and German which British students were not interested in, nearly 90% of British students in the university were able to speak at least one other language alongside English in 2010.
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education i e splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance 88
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes Others however think that changes is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education To what extent do you agree with this opinion 88
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8320610687 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45079780538 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477099236641 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1402714403 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.857142857 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4285714286 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364882194626 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202701340519 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990197492821 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262509688945 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494609826201 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8320610687 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45079780538 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477099236641 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1402714403 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.857142857 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4285714286 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364882194626 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202701340519 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990197492821 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262509688945 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494609826201 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.