The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following table shows when underground railway systems of six cities opened as well as their length and how many passengers, they carry each year.
As can be observed from the table, six different cities of London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles are surveyed. Whereas the oldest system belongs to London, it opened in 193, it has the longest route by 394 km. Followed by Paris, Tokyo, DC, Kyoto, and LA in terms of opening dates as 1900, 1927, 1976, 1981, and 2001, respectively. The length of these cities follows more or less the same order as opening dates. Routes of systems in Paris, Tokyo, and DC are in a row 199, 155, and 126 km. However, although LA underground railway system is far newer than Kyoto, system route of LA is longer than Kyoto, 28 km in comparison with 11 km.
Turning to passengers per year in millions, Tokyo subway system transports the maximum number of passengers in a year which is 1927 million. The closest figure to Tokyo is Paris by 1191 million. London with 775 million, DC with 144 million, and LA with 50 million are placed after London. The least number of passengers is carried by Kyoto subway system with 45 million.
Overall, it is clear from the table that the pattern of route and opening date order is similar together except LA. London has the oldest and longest system, while Tokyo subway transports the greatest number of individuals each year. Unlike France and England, two countries of USA and Japan have two distinctive cities in this table.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-28 | Nguyenhoa27 | view | |
| 2022-08-28 | Nguyenhoa27 | view | |
| 2021-04-14 | sattar_iust | 56 | view |
| 2017-07-23 | June_Le | 64 | view |
| 2014-06-22 | drjowelynt | 75 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans bellow show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Government should allocate resources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
- Working employees have paid leaves Is it good or bad 85
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74339622642 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36340318551 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9638980086 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112320701034 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417670919108 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435163430028 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842626204381 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550746634015 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.