The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university, in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The comparison to the percentage of British students at a University in England, who were capable of addressing their thoughts in various languages despite the English language, and between 2000 and 2010 is depicted by the charts.
An overall glance at the figures manifests that Spanish was the prominently spoken language while a few individuals seemed to communicate in German in both years.
To commerce with it was readily noticed that there were the highest 30% pupils who could address in the Spanish language until 2000. By 2010 the population of Spanish speakers boosted by 5%, which accounted for 35%.In addition, despite the English language, the second fifths of disciples were unable to talk in other languages by 2000, on the other hand, a fall of 10% was evidenced in 2010.
Moving further, French and another language would speak in an equal proportion(15%) until 2000. Nevertheless, the trend of speaking another language had been elevated by 5% as well as French communicator had declined by 5% in the year 2010. Moreover, there were 10% and 15% English pupils, who could talk in other languages in 2000-2010 respectively.
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 78
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... boosted by 5%, which accounted for 35%.In addition, despite the English language,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13903743316 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77011541648 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1006987341 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.285714286 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 5.23603664747 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289247577143 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13862767182 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781590463927 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17423971402 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837836560301 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.