The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
These two pie charts illustrate the percentages of British students at one university who can speak foreign languages in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, Spanish is a foreign language which most students learned in both year 2000 and 2010. The most significant change was students tried to learn a foreign language increased rapidly. The proportion of students who learned German remained the same at 10%.
Spanish was the most popular for students to learn as a second language in 2000 and 2010 and the numbers of students who learned this language went up slightly from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010. There is a notable change in the percentage of students who decided to learn a second language which doubled the figure. The numbers of students who wanted to learn a foreign other than French, German and Spanish, and to learn two more languages also increased by 5%.
On the other hand, The popularity of French decreased a little from 15% in 200 and 10% in 2010. In addition, the percentage of students who spoke no other language decreased which means, British students were more willing to learn other foreign languages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89528795812 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52177817204 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4654411061 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343229099359 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172782974413 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997133107169 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258230838155 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889645295616 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.