The bar chart unfolds a statistical comparison in the reasons why Americans traveled and the pie chart illustrates their primary concerns about public travel in 2009. At the first glance, it is conspicuous that commuting to and from work was the primary reason why Americans traveled in 2009 whereas the cost of traveling was the major issue Americans were most concerned about in the same year.
The largest proportion of the travel’s reason was commuting to and from work, with its percentage standing at 49%, which was eight and five times more than that of those involved in social and recreational activities and those visiting friends or relatives respectively. However, the proportion of people travelling for shopping and personal reasons accounted for 35% combined.
As far as the pie chart is concerned, the largest proportion of people concerned about travelling was the travel budget, which was six times more than that of those caring about space for pedestrians. In addition, the second larger proportion of people’s primary concern was safety, with its percentage standing at 19%. There were 17 % and 14% of people concerned about the issues of aggressive drivers and highway congestion respectively. However, only 8 % of the U.S. residents thought that access to public transport should be prioritized.
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 87
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30952380952 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84478547149 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4020990791 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.375 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223702850709 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111975940796 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806082452813 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163591037827 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423307168961 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30952380952 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84478547149 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4020990791 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.375 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223702850709 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111975940796 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806082452813 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163591037827 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423307168961 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.