In the past few years, animals have been frequently used in many various scientific experiments and sold to people as daily products. Some people claim that people do not necessarily use animals as food, clothing and drugs. As far as I am concerned, I strongly agree with this idea to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, all animals should be treated equally instead of being controlled or abused by humans, and this is because they are not born for human benefits. Some would assert that human beings cannot live without the aid or sacrifice of animals, and that animals provide people with necessary nutrients such as vitamin B12 and protein. However, these arguments are not necessarily justifiable for the following reasons. First and foremost, a recent medical study has shown that people will increase their life expectancy if they eat less meat or even become a vegetarian. Moreover, there is scientific evidence that people can substitute many plants or artificial substances for nutrients found in animals.
From another perspective, zero-tolerance toward the killing of animals is also meant to protect the food chain. Every plant and animal species, no matter how big or small, depends to some extent on another plant or animal species for its survival. It is reported that the ecosystem has been greatly disturbed by human activities such as hunting and overconsumption. Therefore, if people keep exploiting animals to maximize their own benefits, the ecological balance will be disturbed, and this will definitely bring about a catastrophe to all species in the world.
In conclusion, the idea of not employing animals in different ways is completely acceptable. In my opinion, we all have the responsibility to treat all animals equally, and protect them to maintain a balanced ecosystem. Hence, protecting animals should be supported.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- agree or disagree Large cities should ban cars from the city center 93
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 89
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85855246973 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2020360132 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160304850368 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531567383853 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488532539357 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995537432878 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457134216197 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.