The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first chart shows that the reasons why people favor in cycling to work. Conversely, the second chart illustrates the reasons for those who prefer driving to work.
The highest percentage of people who say it's healthier when cycling, with 30%. This amount percentage is also the same as the reason for those who would like to reduce the pollution issues. On the one hand, it's 15% to which people would like to cycle to work because of the parking problem. On the other hand, they say that it's much cheaper than driving to work, with 13%. Surprisingly, it's 12% for cycling is faster than driving.
In contrast, many people enjoy driving to work because they feel very comfortable, with 40%, the highest percentage of all. Some people say that the reason why they choose driving to work is depending on the distance that takes 21%. Both of the reason for carrying things while going to work and be safe is the same percentage than 14%. Interestingly, people think it's faster than cycling with 14%, by contrast to those who say cycling is faster than driving.
In general, it seems that the majority of people who choose a cycle to work for their health and environmental. By contrast, many people who choose to travel to work by car because of being comfortable.
- Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...ple say that the reason why they choose driving to work is depending on the distance th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... reason why they choose driving to work is depending on the distance that takes 21%. Both of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, second, so, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71621621622 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4238796918 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468468468468 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.847566666 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5384615385 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1732053594 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847743796463 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076591687897 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143393618496 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708470699786 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.