The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
The pie charts blow illustrate the percentage of US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. In general, it can be clearly seen that in 1996 was the biggest percentage than other patters but the rate of car increased and had the hugest grade in 1996.
In 1996, the food dominated more than quarter of diagram which was 44%. Following by the second biggest, it was the car that stood 25% while the other patters have percentage around 10% and less. The lowest patterns for US in 1996 was the computers which just 1% from total of percentage.
On the other hands, US spending patterns in 1996 had significantly changed by over 30 years. In the several component, such cars, restaurants were completely different, where the cars patters turned up to be 45% in 1996. The food decreased to 30%. Furthermore the computers also were stood into 10%
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 56
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 73
- 2. Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages 70
- The charts below the main reason for study among students of different age groups and amount of support they received from employeers. 78
- 2. Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...45% in 1996. The food decreased to 30%. Furthermore the computers also were stood into 10% ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 701.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76870748299 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54272574394 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9642456875 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8888888889 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286514050038 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126669203891 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168230609367 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203707643629 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104541588689 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.