The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The two bar charts given illustrate how many UK graduate and postgraduate students who opted for different destination in place of full-time work after finishing their college in 2008.
Overall, it is clear that the number of UK students decided to study further was highest in both groups, while a very small percentage of students started to work on a voluntary basis. Another key figure is that the number of graduates in each destination was exponentially higher than corresponding number of postgraduates.
In 2008, 29995 UK graduate students chose to study further, which was over ten times as high as the figure for postgraduate students in the same destination. The number of part time work was lower significantly with 17735 students. However the figure for postgraduates in the UK participating in part time job was just approximately 200 people lower than those who undertook further study.
Meanwhile, it can be seen in both charts the the lower number of students doing voluntary work or without work in the UK. There was 16235 unemployed graduates, the figure for postgraduates was nearly ten times lower. Likewise, the quantity of graduates worked on a voluntary basis was noticeable higher than that of postgraduates, accounted for 3500 adn 345 students, respectively.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emission per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1976 and 2007 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use 56
- The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... in the same destination. The number of part time work was lower significantly with 17735...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ower significantly with 17735 students. However the figure for postgraduates in the UK ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ostgraduates in the UK participating in part time job was just approximately 200 people l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...eanwhile, it can be seen in both charts the the lower number of students doing voluntar...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...eanwhile, it can be seen in both charts the the lower number of students doing voluntar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08045931969 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.475596442 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260787367777 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123794970403 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925936311658 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191580137432 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966721147322 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.