The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given two bar graphs provide employment information excluding full-time employment on UK graduate and postgraduate students after they left college in 2008.

Overall, the majority of both graduate and postgraduate students preferred to pursue higher education, whereas voluntary work was the less prominent career path among students.

As we can see from the first chart, further study prevailed among graduate students in 2008 (29,665). Unfortunately, the number of students involved in part-time job accounts for 17, 735 which is slightly above the number of students coped with unemployment. With regards volunteering, a mere 3500 students chose a voluntary work as a occupation after graduation.

In the same way, the huge quantity of postgraduate students continued further education (2,725). However, almost the same number of postgraduates engaged in part-time employment. Similar to graduate students correlation between students went to volunteering and jobless postgraduates is approximately 1 to 5 which is 345 and 1,625, respectively.

Votes
Average: 4 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...3500 students chose a voluntary work as a occupation after graduation. In the...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work as a occupation after graduation. In the same way, the huge quantity of po...
^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rt-time employment. Similar to graduate students correlation between students went to vo...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85714285714 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2498686352 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655844155844 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9165699921 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233292899026 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990762863717 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538608943332 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143710671214 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555758280686 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.4140731707 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.