The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.

Essay topics:

The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.

The two charts below illustrate some data about what British graduate and postgraduate students did after leaving college in 2008. These students did not participate in full-time work.

Overall, most of the graduate and postgraduate students did further study, which the number of graduates is significantly more than postgraduates. Voluntary work had the least volunteers for both kinds of students at the given year.

In 2008, further study had 29.665 graduate and 2/725 postgraduate students, which as it can be seen, the first aspect is almost 15 times more than the second one. On the other hand, voluntary work containing the least number of students, had 3500 graduate volunteers and 345 postgraduate volunteers.

In terms of part-time work and unemployment, in 2008 for both kinds of students, part-time work had more participants than unemployment. The difference between these two aspects is very slight for graduate students. To sum up, further study, part-time work ,unemployment and voluntary work, respectively had the most to least number of students.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 pateldhruv1708 91 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-07 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2020-01-06 trunghn1 67 view
2019-12-26 Lai Nhu Phuong 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two charts below illustrate some dat...
^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...To sum up, further study, part-time work ,unemployment and voluntary work, respect...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the least'.
Suggestion: to the least
...luntary work, respectively had the most to least number of students.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4578313253 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01616586014 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2240259265 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339341119672 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164846948789 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134040047214 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218675869491 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183961840301 0.0819641961636 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.