The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A quick glance at two charts compares the jobs of UK graduate and postgraduate, excluding full-time work, in 2008. The number of graduate students had careers outweighed that of postgraduate students.
Regarding graduate students, almost 30.000 of them had intentions in further study, followed by 18.000 of then went for part-time work. The number of students who did voluntary work was 3.500 whereas 16.235 of them were unemployed.
On the contrary, the number of postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work was fewer than that of graduate ones. The number of postgraduate students studied further was 10 times lower than the statistics of graduate students. This was the same with the number of students who went for voluntary work and unemployment, 345 and 1.625 students respectively. 2.535 students were employed for part-time work.
In conclusion, a vast majority of both graduate and postgraduate students studied further while a minority of them went for voluntary work. The number of unemployed students was significant back then.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people nowadays see a counselor or therapist to improve their mental health Some feel however that this is unnecessary Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- More and more couples are deciding to be child free to have no children in other words Some people claim that those couples reach this conclusion through entirely selfish reasons While others think that they came to this decision through noble motives suc 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many people now have the freedom to work and live anywhere because of advances in communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4156626506 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93173034604 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8008389144 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262746078932 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127878194051 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078747981837 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174814905203 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621130827457 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4156626506 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93173034604 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8008389144 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262746078932 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127878194051 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078747981837 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174814905203 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621130827457 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.