The charts bleow give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009
The pie charts given below compare the sources for the production of electricity in France and Germany in the year 2009.
Overall, it is clear from the data that the significant amount of electric energy came from Nuclear power in France, while conventional thermal accounted for more than 50$ energy production in Germany. It is also evident that Germany produced more electricity than France in the given year, 560 billion KWh and 510 Billion KWh respectively.
As the graph shows, 59.6% of German electricity was produced from conventional thermal energies whereas it accounted for only 10.3% in France. In terms of nuclear energy used for power generation was 76% in France and only 23% in Germany.
However, the use of Renewable energy sources in Germany and France accounted for only 17.4% and 13.7% respectively. Germany used 39.3% Biomass, 36.9% wind power, 17.7% Hydroelectric power and 6.1% solar power. By contrast, Hydroelectric accounted for 80% among all other renewable energy sources in France. The total proportion of Biomass, Wind and Solar was 19.5%. None of the countries generated electricity form Geothermal energy.
- Do we learn most from the people whose views we share 83
- Important truths begin as outrageous or at least uncomfortable attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 75
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
- The charts bleow give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 73
- Political leaders should withhold information from public 2 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
...ntional thermal accounted for more than 50$ energy production in Germany. It is als...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32596685083 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75694482861 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2613041047 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101363631864 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529226294568 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711647749496 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780506765977 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437334836347 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.