The charts give information about honey-bee colonies and honey production in the US
The first bar chart depicts the amount of honey-bee colonies in the USA over the course from 1970 to 2010 whilst the second graph illustrates the proportion of products which were made from honey in this period.
Overall, as can be inferred from the data, there was a downward trend in the amount of honey-bee society with a sole exception of this figure in the year 1980, and it was associated with the recession of honey production throughout the period.
In particular, the graph witnessed a slight increase from 1970 to 1980, at 4 and around 4.3 million respectively. However, this proportion dropped significantly to 3.5 million in 1990 and there was a similar tendency in the next 20 years and the lowest number was observed in 2010 (1.8 million).
Looking at the bar chart, the decline of bee colonies was the prime reason that poses a threat to honey products. Between 1970 and 1980, the figure for these items fell down to 110000 tone. In contrast, it rose steadily to nearly 120000 tone but this number bottom out in the last year of the period.
- The charts give information about honey-bee colonies and honey production in the US 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 countries 73
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative trend? 73
- the line graph shows thefts per thounsand vehicles in 4 european countries between 1990 and 1999 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6935483871 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4846679818 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5311805432 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224868858077 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100791722224 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119204254415 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149062392662 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988185038947 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.