The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980, with projections until 2030.

The provided line graph illustrates the trends of six different fuel consumption in the USA over a 50-year period.

Overall, Petrol and Oil, as well as Coal and Natural Gas, experienced gradual increases and are projected to continue growing at a similar pace, except for Natural Gas. Other fuels, on the other hand, showed minimal variation.

Initially, petrol and oil started at 35 quadrillion units, which dropped to just above 30 within the next five years, and then rose back to a similar level. Subsequently, it exhibited fluctuations but followed an upward trend and is expected to reach around 50 quadrillion units by 2030.

Natural Gas, which initially occupied 20 quadrillion units in 1980, experienced a slight decline and is projected to continue fluctuating upward, reaching approximately 25 quadrillion units until 2015, after which it will stabilize.

Coal, on the other hand, started at a level of 4 quadrillion units below that of Natural Gas and exhibited a similar pattern of fluctuation, surpassing the quadrillion unit mark by 2030.

Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and Hydropower all started at approximately 4 quadrillion units and experienced slight increases for around seven years. Nuclear and Solar/Wind showed minor fluctuations before experiencing marginal upward shifts. In contrast, hydropower remained constant from 2012 onwards.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-13 reverjae 61 view
2024-01-13 reverjae 56 view
2023-05-15 Saul 78 view
2023-05-15 Saul 11 view
2023-05-15 Saul 11 view
Essays by user Saul :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, except for, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59903381643 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04851971068 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5170448521 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835740166955 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338833061627 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347647828989 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485425763266 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328440320602 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.