The four presented pie chart gives data about the changes in terms of proportion of three different sectors about how people worked in Town A and Town B over a period of 50 years, between 1960 and 2010.
A glance at the charts reveals that the percentage of manufacturing in both towns has an upward tendency in 2010 compared with 1960 while there was a decline of the proportion of people working in sales over the same period.
In Town A, sales made up the biggest part of the chart in 1960 with 41%, however, fell and stood at exactly 20% in 2010. Similarly, people working in services occupied 30% at the beginning and also went down to 16% at the end of the period. By contrast, manufacturing was the smallest segment in 1960 but then surpassed others and attracted the highest proportion of workers which was 64% by 2010.
Turning to Town B, sales saw a decline in the number of people but it was still the most significant part of the distribution of employment in 1960 and 2010. On the contrary, manufacturing and services had a ceiling trend when it came from 10% and 20% then went up to 25% and 22% within fifty years.
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 84
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47826086957 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53191719485 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.891456895 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337316485257 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15272633016 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105070902916 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219499735961 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803205109439 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.