The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of working force engaged in different occupational fields mainly manufacturing, sales, and services in two towns A and B over a period of two years 1960 and 2010.
In the overall trend, nearly after half a century, a major proportional jump can be observed in the manufacturing sector in town A, whereas sales remained the most popular working sector in town B however, it faced a slight downfall in the latter year.
According to the given illustration, in town A, 41% of the population was associated with sales in 1960, which got shrunk by almost half in 2010. Also, nearly one-third of the masses were interested in the service sector in 1960, which dropped down by 50% in the latter year. On the contrary, the manufacturing sector that accounted for just 29% before 60 years, witnessed a huge surge by more than two-fold in 2010.
For town B, nearly three-fourth of the people were indulged in the sales sector, which fell down to 53% in 2010, a major dropdown by 17%. However, a slight increase of 2% in the service department can be observed, but a significant rise of about 15% in the manufacturing sector shifted the percentage to 25% in 2010.
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80861244019 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.818916891 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0505041344 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409808800022 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168010098965 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830584090313 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237584431527 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731860286722 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.