The bar chart gives information about the amount of money which students in Singapore spent on their higher education diplomas and degrees by genders in the 2000-2012 period.
Overall, it is clear that the figures had an increasing trend between 2000 and 2012. Nevertheless, the proportion of tuition fee which was contributed by male students was significantly higher than that of their counterparts.
In 2000, about 7 million dollars was paid by girls, compared to roughly 9 million dollars of boys. After four years, in 2004, students witnessed a double growth of the expenditure, precisely 20 million dollars and approximately 13 million dollars of males and females, respectively.
In the 2008-2012 period, the amount of money was spent on higher education continuously experienced a steady increase, in which the figure of males in 2008 increased from around 27 million dollars to over 30 million dollars in 2012, while that of females also had a rise from roughly 13 million dollars to exactly 20 million dollars at the same time.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The maps below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day 67
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- the diagram below show how sand dunes are formed 61
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups UK 1990 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17159763314 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87654309764 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.6085041534 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201053404639 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11401689271 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105235978033 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152719402337 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114142889804 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.