The bar chart illustrates the expenses spent on schools in Singapore, measured in millions of US dollars, while the pie charts compare the percentage of students pursuing higher education degrees and diplomas, between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of money spent on both genders increased, while the figure for boys was always higher than that of girls throughout the observed period. Additionally, students opting for diplomas took up a higher proportion compared to those chosen degrees.
More specifically, despite starting at only around 10 million US dollars in 2000, the expenditure invested in males rose significantly, from 20 million to over 30 million US dollars in 2004 and 2012, respectively. Meanwhile, after a slight increase of about 4 million US dollars in 2004, the figure for females remained the same at 12 million US dollars, followed by sharply climbing to 20 million US dollars in 2012.
The proportion of people joining higher education diploma was far higher than that of those studied diploma, with roughly three-fourths in 2000 compared to only 0.27% in the later category. A similar trend can be seen in 2012, with 0.68% and 0.32% for diploma learners and degree learners, accordingly.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 80
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 53
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 78
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.235 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81385411846 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8052666075 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270185350027 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128671115326 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883570724234 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172294804894 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876712691798 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.