The graphs illustrate the number of pineapples exported from 3 diffierent nations in the years of 2009 and 2019, along with the elements affecting to the price of a pineapple by 2019.
It can be clearly seen in the first bar chart that country A and C had a rise in world pineapple exports. Particularly, country A gained a rocket figure which was from around 1 million metric tonnes in the first year shown to over 10 million metric tonnes in the later year. Meanwhile, country C achieved a slight excess in 2019 with about 0.5 million metric tonnes. In contrast, country B was the only nation having a slump in the amount of exported pineapples. It decreased from nearly 5 million metric tonnes to just less than 2 million metric tonnes in the same period compared. However, it was still much higher than country C in which was considered as the weakest pineapple-producing countries among the three.
On the other hand, the pie chart shows us the largest ratio in breakdown of cost per pineapple was for distribution & retail (35%). Unlike the export costs possessed the lowest rate (only 4%). Hence, export costs obviously did not influence on the price charge consumers as other types of costs. There were also 5 out of 8 elements having the percentage of 10% and above, which were import licences, international transport, taxes, profit and distribution & retail.
- 5 The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om around 1 million metric tonnes in the first year shown to over 10 million metr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, while, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83760683761 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76213990128 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6840429651 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273895398163 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103042851209 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867697942346 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198660451022 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650910102553 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.