The column graph shows the rate of consumers (in three age group) taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares three different age group in terms of the percentage of people consuming healthy food from 2011 to 2016.
Overall, the rate of people taking healthy food fluctuated between 2011 and 2016. In addition, the figure for customers eating healthy food between 31 and 40 years of age witnessed a different trend with other age groups during this period.
In 2011, the proportion of people eating healthy diets in the youngest age group stood at around 75%, which was the highest of three age group, while the figure for the oldest age group was the lowest, at about 35%. The percentage of people aged from 21 to 30 years old accounted for exactly 70%. Over the next 2 years, the rate of customers in the 21-30 age group fell rapidly to nearly 25% in 2013. By contrast, the proportion of people in the oldest age group went up dramatically and the figure for those in 2013 was approximately 2 times that in 2011. The figure for customers in the youngest age group declined gradually to 60% in 2013.
While the percentage of people aged from 31 to 40 years old showed a downward trend from 2014 to 2016, the figure for other age groups witnessed upward trend over the same period. The figure for people in the oldest age group went down by about 35% from around 65% in 2014 to just above 30% in 2016. The proportion of people in the youngest group climbed gradually from 50% in 2014 to approximately 65% in 2016. The figure for customers in the 21-30 age group consumed less healthy food than that of other age groups from 2014 to 2016, which increased to exactly 40% in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-16 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 58
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...% in 2014 to approximately 65% in 2016. The figure for customers in the 21-30 age g...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30032036148 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381944444444 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0778393892 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252482187661 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133894079135 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823655361368 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21450459229 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528216218023 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...% in 2014 to approximately 65% in 2016. The figure for customers in the 21-30 age g...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30032036148 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381944444444 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0778393892 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252482187661 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133894079135 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823655361368 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21450459229 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528216218023 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.