Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion?
It is true that people have different views about employees should work for only one company or different companies in all their career. While some people believe that staying in a business brings a lot of advantages, I would argue that it is better to work for different businesses all their working life.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people should stay at one company during their career. Firstly, the workers could advance opportunities at their organization. This is because when they work for the same company for a long time, they will gain long-term experience, wide knowledge and skills. As a result, they can have opportunities to advance their position at team or department at their company. Secondly, the employees are extremely loyal with their organization, so they do not have any ideas about they will quit their jobs and they can devote their working life for the development of business.
On the other hand, I believe that when people change to another organizations in their working life, it will bring several benefits for them. One reason for this view is that the workers will have chance to learn and improve their knowledge and new skills about a variety fields of company. For example, some young people are more likely to switch jobs and stay at one business in a short period time because they want to continue to learn and grow through training courses in the business. Another reason is that they want to find better environmental workplace which makes them feel comfortable to work and devote in the company. If they find an appropriate workplace with good bosses, great colleagues and healthy work environment, they can promote their performance and work efficiently.
In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that becoming a longtime employee in one organization have a lot of benefits, I believe that the workers also could move to many different companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of people affected by rift valley fever in three countries in 1915 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age group taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eve that the workers also could move to many different companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99068322981 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66366407125 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484472049689 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8392225347 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350600167932 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142748380573 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103524918395 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234884311674 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1238461258 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.