Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that tourism is a huge industry and tourism expansion is playing a key role in many developing countries in the world. There are a number of reasons why this is the case, and in my opinion the development of international tourist markets has both positive and negative effects.
There are various reasons why many places are expanding and growing tourism industries. One reason for this view is that the development of tourism has a significant impact on economic growth in many countries. This is because it generates income through the consumption of goods and services by tourists. For example, the expenditure of foreigners often includes local foods, accommodation and transportation. Therefore, the business can earn enormous profits from tourists and the government can increase their budget from taxation. Another reason is that tourism industry creates employment for local people, so this will increase the standard of living of people and unemployment rate also will decrease at the same time.
On the other hand, I think that expanding tourist industries can be extremely drawbacks in the countries. Firstly, tourists cause environmental problems like erosion and pollution. For this reason, tourists visit a huge number of places by cars, planes and boats. This contributes to increase the emission of carbon dioxide into atmosphere, so it is the cause of air pollution. Secondly, some tourists are lack of respect for local traditions and cultural heritage. For example, some foreigners act badly and damage ancient building, temples and monument.
In conclusion, although many developing countries believe that tourism industry expansion is a key factor in national economic growth and a source of income and employment, however I think that tourism can also a cause of problem in the countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-18 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of difficulties of living in city How can government make urban life better for everyone 67
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92513445072 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524305555556 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0710057083 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330246913586 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10040520228 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904191905151 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216637923388 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119492472702 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92513445072 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524305555556 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0710057083 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330246913586 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10040520228 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904191905151 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216637923388 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119492472702 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.