The chart compares the number of vehicles got stolen per thousand vehicles in four big nations over a period of 10 years from 1990.
It is clear from the graph that Britain by far had the highest rate of car thefts. Additionally, Sweden experienced the most dramatic change during the research period.
In 1990, only 6 cars were stolen out of 1000 cars in France, whereas the rate of car thefts recorded in Canada were slightly higher, at 7 vehicles per 1000 vehicles. Meanwhile, Britain had the highest rate of cars stolen, at 18 vehicles, compared to just only 8 cars were stolen in Sweden. By 1996, the figure for Britain had a risen by 2 cars to 20 cars. In the same year, while the number of car thefts in France witnessed a 1 vehicles increase, to 7 vehicles, the figure for Canada declined slightly to roughly 5 cars. However, the most significant change was witnessed in Sweden, where the number of car thefts jumped from 8 to 13 vehicles.
In the year 1999, Britain and France both experienced declines in their figures, to 16 vehicles and 6 vehicles respectively. By contrast, Sweden's figure remained stable at 12 cars during 1996 to 1998 but rose slightly to 14 cars in 1999. Moreover, there were 6 out of 1000 cars were stolen in Canada in 1999.
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 67
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60619469027 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51707692516 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9364527136 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6363636364 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259512030681 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113778514565 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831407357094 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129765660147 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113889173694 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.