The given graphs show data on the percentage of people who had a computer during five years since 2002 to 2010, also by comparison of education level to 2002 and 2010. It is observed that the computer ownership has increased over the years and this is common significantly higher in the postgraduate population.
According to the first graph, during 2002, the portion of people owner of a computer had been reaching 50%, that have been steaded upward, therefore to 2010, the highest amount of ownership is recorded in three quarters of this population.
In terms of level of education, there are a rise significantly when the people complete studies along their lifes. A group of people who did not recieve a high school diploma posses the lowest amount of computer. The rank followed by high school graduates, who did not finish the college and bachelor degree, whereas the ownership for the group of postgraduates is the highest percentage.
Overall, there are significant changes between the gap of 10 years from 2002 to 2010, the rise has been proportional.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 61
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 78
- Computer ownership 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raph, during 2002, the portion of people owner of a computer had been reaching 5...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e owner of a computer had been reaching 50%, that have been steaded upward, ther...
^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...erms of level of education, there are a rise significantly when the people complete ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01685393258 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75451105372 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4119466436 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21026361801 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964632953663 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106643733843 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122415076389 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981143933138 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.