the consumption of fast food
the line graph illustrates changes the expenditure of fast food in Britain over the period of 20 years starting from 1970.
It is obvious that while the amount of pizza consumed in the UK fell, the opposite was true for Hamburger and Fish & Chips.
Also the figure for Fish & Chips consumption was highest during the period.
In 1970, the amount of pizza eaten was largest with over 300g, compared with very little Fish & Chips was eaten , less than 100g and Hamburger was nearly 50g. Over the following 10 years, the expenditure of Hamburger and Fish & Chips slightly increased by 50g, whereas that the amount of pizza saw a decrease of over 200g.
From 1980 onward, the figure for consumption of Fish & Chips rose dramatically and reach a peak at 500g in 1990. Similarly, the amount of Hamburger consumed in the UK growth gradually to under 300 in 1990. Meanwhile, the expenditure of pizza in Britain remained stable at 200 in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph illustrates changes the expe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... true for Hamburger and Fish & Chips. Also the figure for Fish & Chips consumption...
^^^^
Line 6, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... with very little Fish & Chips was eaten , less than 100g and Hamburger was nearly...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84472049689 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5108320677 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1686440995 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103093292861 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472922264861 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673293542387 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06880270798 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719774363588 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.