The diagrams present the differences that have occured at West Park Secondary School for 60 years developments.
The noticeable difference between the years of construction designed. In 1950 West Park Secondary Schools territory was narrow. Between 1980 and 2010 the school's other buildings were broadened.
In 1980 the area of Secondary School consisted of only four parts: houses, farmland and playground. Playground situated at the top of the school and right-hand corner of the farmland. In 1980 playground did not alter. Coming to the 2010 year it was narrowed. Farmland was replaced with with a sports field. Houses were removed and then there were added other buildings such as car park and science block.
In 1980 playground which was located next to the sports field and bottom of the right corner of school. In 2010 car park was removed which was located next to the science block. Then car park was enlarged more compared as other two years. Sports field was shortened which was located the bottom of the diagram.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 67
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 89
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- Some people believe that parents have a great influence on children s growth but others think that influence from the outside plays a more important role Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot alter. Coming to the 2010 year it was narrowed. Farmland was replaced with wit...
^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...it was narrowed. Farmland was replaced with with a sports field. Houses were removed and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was located next to the sports field and bottom of the right corner of school. ...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts field and bottom of the right corner of school. In 2010 car park was removed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08235294118 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52979477264 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3304784454 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.7142857143 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1428571429 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138677930912 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581554235746 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714461898384 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123526609583 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755484485149 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.